Exigent Circumstances in the Law
Business people discussing in the cafe

The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures, generally requiring law enforcement to obtain a warrant before entering private property. However, there are certain situations where police can bypass this requirement—these are known as exigent circumstances.

In Washington State and across the country, exigent circumstances allow law enforcement officers to act swiftly when waiting for a warrant could lead to harm, evidence destruction, or suspect escape. Understanding when exigent circumstances apply is crucial, whether you are facing a criminal case or wish to challenge an unlawful search.

What Are Exigent Circumstances?

Exigent circumstances refer to urgent situations where law enforcement can enter a home, conduct a search, or make an arrest without first obtaining a warrant. Courts have recognized that in emergencies, requiring police to secure a warrant could undermine public safety or allow criminal activity to continue.

To justify a warrantless search or entry, police must demonstrate that the situation was truly urgent and that immediate action was necessary. If the alleged exigency is not well-founded, any evidence obtained may be challenged in court.

Common Situations Where Exigent Circumstances Apply

Preventing Imminent Harm or Danger

Law enforcement may enter a residence without a warrant if they reasonably believe that someone inside is in immediate danger. For example, if police hear screams or gunshots coming from inside a home, they can enter to ensure that no one is being harmed.

Preventing the Destruction of Evidence

If police have probable cause to believe that critical evidence is about to be destroyed, they may act without a warrant. A common example is when officers suspect a suspect is flushing illegal drugs down the toilet while they attempt to secure a warrant. However, police cannot create the urgency themselves—courts carefully review whether the risk of evidence destruction was truly imminent.

Pursuit of a Fleeing Suspect (Hot Pursuit)

The hot pursuit doctrine allows officers to enter a home or private property without a warrant if they are actively chasing a suspect. This applies if the suspect is fleeing from police after committing a crime and enters a private location to avoid arrest. However, the crime in question must generally be a serious offense.

Addressing Fire or Medical Emergencies

If emergency responders, such as firefighters or paramedics, enter a home for a fire or medical emergency and discover illegal activity or evidence of a crime, law enforcement may be able to seize that evidence without a warrant. Additionally, police can enter if they believe immediate medical aid is required.

Threats to National Security or Public Safety

In cases involving terrorism, bomb threats, or other large-scale threats to public safety, courts may allow warrantless searches under exigent circumstances.

Limitations on Exigent Circumstances

While exigent circumstances provide police with greater flexibility in emergencies, they are not a free pass to ignore the Fourth Amendment. Courts will assess whether:

  • The officers had an objectively reasonable belief that an emergency existed.
  • The search or entry was limited to addressing the emergency (and not an excuse to conduct a broader search).
  • The situation was not created by law enforcement to justify a warrantless action.

If an officer claims exigent circumstances improperly, any evidence obtained may be suppressed in court, meaning it cannot be used against a defendant.

If you believe that police violated your constitutional rights by entering your home or conducting a search without a warrant and without valid exigent circumstances, you may be able to challenge the evidence in court. The exclusionary rule prevents unlawfully obtained evidence from being used in a criminal trial. A skilled defense attorney can argue that the alleged emergency was not real or did not justify bypassing the warrant requirement.

While exigent circumstances allow law enforcement to act quickly in emergencies, they also have strict legal limits. If you or a loved one is facing criminal charges and believe a warrantless search violated your rights, legal action may be possible. The Law Office of Erin Bradley McAleer is dedicated to protecting constitutional rights and challenging unlawful police actions. Contact us today for a consultation to discuss your case.